The dispute arose after the Fish and Wildlife Service designated 1,500-acres (607-hectares) of land and ponds in neighboring Louisiana as critical habitat for the frog even though none lived there. If no federal support or authorization is involved in the activities or land modifications that you want to conduct on your private land, critical habitat designations will not impact your ability to proceed. Unlike, stand-alone easement legislation, which tends to be enforced under common law, such an agreement appears to be enforceable under the Wildlife Conservation Act . ... Third, the rate of public to private land conversion and vice-versa in the US is low (Lubowski et al., 2006), therefore, public land data from 2000 will look very similar to data from 1990. © Property and Environment Research Center 2020 | Privacy Policy | Career Opportunities. The designation of jaguar critical habitat in April 2014 in southern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico created concern for livestock ranchers in the region. We anticipate consistently excluding from critical habitat designations areas that are covered by properly i… On February 14, 1992, the government designated 2.1 million acres of federal land as critical habitat in Washington State, representing about 1/3 of the total designation of 6.9 million acres across California, Oregon and Washington. A designation of critical habitat provides Federal agencies with a clear indication as to when consultation under section 7 of the ESA is required, particularly in cases where the proposed action would not result in immediate mortality, injury, or harm to individuals of a listed species (e.g., an action occurring within the critical habitat area when a migratory species is not present). In this virtual policy briefing, experts from the Pacific Legal Foundation and the Center for Growth and Opportunity explain the impact of the proposed critical habitat reforms and share their insights on where the rules will succeed or need improvement. Critical habitat designations on private land can discourage property owners from maintaining or restoring habitat for listed species. Critical habitat designations on private land can discourage property owners from maintaining or restoring habitat for listed species. The Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in this important Endangered Species Act case on the first day of the new term: October 1st, 2018. 1616 P St. NW Washington, DC 20036 202-328-5000 www.rff.org June 2015 RFF DP 15-27 Identifying the Impacts of Critical Habitat Designation on Land Cover Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration propose to adopt a policy (Policy) governing exclusion of lands from critical habitat designation under section 4(b)(2)of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Some environmental groups have considered critical habitat designations essential for species' recovery. The Property and Environment Research Center (PERC) respectfully submits this comment supporting the U.S. A designation requires Federal agencies to ensure that actions they plan to undertake, fund, or authorize do not destroy or adversely modify that habitat. © Pacific Legal Foundation, 2020. Posted in Court Decisions. Clarifying when areas will be designated as “critical habitat” under the Endangered Species Act can reduce conflict and build landowner goodwill for conserving and recovering many listed species. Fish and Wildlife Service designated more than 1,500 acres of land in Louisiana as a “critical habitat” for the endangered dusky gopher frog. Pacific Legal Foundation has fought for Edward and his family’s business, Markle Interests, LLC, since the very beginning, when the feds first forced their way onto his property with their bogus designation. 27,052 (May 12, 2014). If no federal support or authorization is involved in the activities or land modifications that you want to conduct on your private land, critical habitat designations will not impact your ability to proceed. PERC is a nonprofit research institute located in Bozeman, Montana that explores market-based solutions to environmental problems. Fish and Wildlife Service designated more than 1,500 acres of land in Louisiana as a “critical habitat” for the endangered dusky gopher frog. However, critical habitat designation may indicate that a … Rather, a critical habitat designation affects only federal agency actions. They can burden landowners with restrictions on … Read PERC’s full public comment on regulations for designated critical habitat. We recognize the strong conservation benefit for listed species that can be provided by efforts of private landowners. The Supreme Court kicked off its new term Monday with the justices appearing split down ideological lines on whether the federal government can designate private land as a critical habitat … Ben Rubin. Contrary to common belief, designating an area as critical habitat does not preclude that area from development. • Inside Critical Habitat areas (versus out), variation in land prices have a larger effect on land cover decisions. Consequently, a critical habitat designation on private land can create both real and perceived burdens on private landowners, pitting their interests against those of listed species. Chief among these is Section 9, prohibiting certain acts in connection with endangered animals and plants.13 Section 9’s prohibitions apply to both private and public land, and rely on human intervention for conservation and recovery. Fish & Wildlife Service. Designation of critical habitat does not: Affect land ownership; Allow the government to take or manage private property; Establish a refuge, reserve, preserve, or other conservation area; Allow government or public access to private land. Because of the land use restrictions potentially implicated by the critical habitat designation, Otay Mesa challenged the final rule in federal court, asserting that (1) the Service improperly determined that the property met the definition of critical habitat in the Endangered Species Act (ESA), (2) the Service did not properly account for the economic consequences of the designation under the ESA, … A critical habitat designation does not necessarily restrict further development. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) published a final rule designating 1,724 acres as critical habitat for the endangered Riverside… Most alarmingly, the federal agency charged with implementing the statute contends that it can designate private land as critical habitat even if it is not occupied by the species and would be inhospitable for the species. DESIGNATION AND PROTECTION OF CRITICAL HABITAT Differentiate Between Public and Private Land Weyerhaeuser v. Fish and Wildlife Service, demonstrates, critical habitat designations on private lands can penalize landowners for the presence of habitat features on their property, in effect discouraging landowners from conserving or restoring habitat for species listed under the Endangered Species Act or those that may be listed in the future. It should trigger a process of consultation between the Recovery Team, the Federal Agency and the landowner(s). Critical habitat designation does not affect all activities that occur within the designated area: An area designated as critical habitat is not necessarily a refuge or a sanctuary for the species. Clarifying when areas will be designated as “critical habitat” under the Endangered Species Act can reduce conflict and build landowner goodwill for conserving and recovering many listed species. 84,480 acres. The Court remanded the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Fifth Circuit) to determine whether the private property was “habitat… But in the case of private land, critical habitat designations can penalize property owners The Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in this important Endangered Species Act case on the first day of the new term: October 1st, 2018. Critical-habitat designations on private land have long been controversial and counterproductive. On average, Critical Habitat designation does not affect land cover change. Our Response: Private agricultural and development activities on private lands will not be affected by designated critical habitat, because the Act does not authorize the Service to regulate private actions on private lands or confiscate private property as a result of critical habitat designation. Much of this land is unsuitable as habitat and will remain so. As the recent Supreme Court case Weyerhaeuser v. Fish and Wildlife Service demonstrates, critical habitat designations on private lands can penalize landowners for the presence of habitat features on their property, in effect discouraging landowners from conserving or restoring habitat for species listed under the Endangered Species Act or those that may be listed in the future. Since 1973, donor-supported PLF has successfully litigated to enforce the Constitution’s guarantee of individual liberty, with an unmatched track record at the U.S. Supreme Court. Identifying the criteria for critical habitat exclusions can help reduce conflicts over critical habitat designations on private lands. The Service now regularly designates critical habitat on private property regardless of whether that property is currently subject to a federal nexus bringing it … Court Rejects Some, But Not All Challenges to Critical Habitat Designation of Private Land. Because private lands provide essential habitat for endangered wildlife, it’s important that reforms boost the incentives for landowners to recover species while still preventing extinction. These benefits often cannot be achieved through the designation of critical habitat, and a critical habitat designation generally has little effect on private lands. Critical habitat designation does not directly restrict private action, but it is often perceived as dramatically affecting the ability to use land and therefore the value of land. The ESA prohibits federal agencies from taking actions that are likely to destroy or adversely modify that critical habitat. Fish and Wildlife Services Proposes New Rule Regarding Exclusion of Lands from Critical Habitat … Critical habitat, as defined in the law, is a specific geographic area that contains features essential for the conservation of a threatened or endangered species and that … Controversy arises over the costs that result from designation of critical habitat, which can be enormous. In combination with habitat areas that are federally owned and managed, over 75% of occupied habitat is protected, with more to come. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service) deem very important to the conservation of species listed under the Act. Critical habitats are required to contain "all areas essential to the conservation" of the imperiled species, and may be on private or public lands. Fish and Wildlife Service ("FWS") designated 143 acres of privately owned land in San Diego County, California as "occupied" by the San Diego fairy shrimp---- also known as sea monkeys---- an endangered aquatic crustacean about the size of an ant and with a lifespan of about 30 days. Designation of private lands as critical habitat could limit the activities that may take place on those lands and as a result reduce the market value of the land. critical habitat designation, however, it is necessary to view critical habitat from a wider perspective that considers the effect of critical habitat designation outside of the formal ESA section 7 consultation process. Identifying the impacts of critical habitat designation on land cover change @article{Nelson2017IdentifyingTI, title={Identifying the impacts of critical habitat designation on land cover change}, author={E. Nelson and John C. Withey and Derric Pennington and J. Lawler}, journal={Resource and Energy Economics}, year={2017}, … In fact, until recently, the Service declined to designate critical habitat… The proposal would not designate stream sections running through private land as critical habitat. Reg. All critical habitat for the guajón, or Puerto Rican cave frog, is found on private lands. Your support empowers countless Americans to fight back and win, at the same time you safeguard the liberties of everyone. In 2012, the U.S. Critical-habitat designations on private land have long been controversial and counterproductive. Ideally, a critical habitat designation would help protect essential habitat and recover imperiled species. On average, Critical Habitat designation does not affect land cover change. SARA s73 offers a limited opportunity to issue permits to carry out activities that may affect habitat or Conservation pursued through the market and property rights is protected from shifting political winds. An Interview with Fulton Mangwanya, Director General of the Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority. In 2012, the U.S. Listing and critical habitat designation trigger the ESA provisions that may interfere with private property use. Direct Roles of Critical Habitat 1) Designation forces consideration of both species needs and the impacts of protection. This includes land owned by our client, Edward Poitevent, and his family. Designations that make habitat features a significant liability for private landowners may, perversely, incentivize preemptive habitat destruction rather than protection. [SARA s48 (3)] See page 2. Critical habitat was not designated on private, state or tribal lands. Fish and Wildlife Service’s proposed rule to clarify its process for excluding land from critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act. In 2012, the U.S. In 2003 the U.S. This approach gets the incentives wrong for conservation, benefiting neither landowners nor the imperiled species who depend on private lands for habitat. Species at risk habitat could also, potentially, be protected on private land under an agreement with a private landowner which may impose a covenant or easement on the private landowner’s land. A podcast on the role of private lands in stewarding our public wildlife. It has a direct legal effect only on federal actions. Although the lower courts ruled against our arguments, we expect a different result before the Supreme Court of the United States. When your property is designated as critical habitat, however, you lose that freedom and, to use your property, must first prove to the government that you won’t adversely modify the habitat or, if you will, meet whatever demands it imposes on you as a condition for its permission. In 2012, the U.S. First, does the Endangered Species Act prohibit designation of private land as unoccupied critical habitat that is neither habitat nor essential to species conservation? PERC has submitted a public comment in support of this proposed rule change. Fish and Wildlife Serviceand the National Marine Fisheries Service to designate critical habitats for listed species, arguing that the agencies are required … A podcast exploring PERC's work on endangered species conservation and recovery. Clarifying when areas will be designated as “critical habitat” under the Endangered Species Act can reduce conflict and build landowner goodwill for conserving and recovering many listed species. Much of this land is unsuitable as habitat and will remain so. Reg. The statute also burdens property owners through the designation of critical habitat, which further restricts land use. In addition, critical habitat designation does not establish specific land management standards or prescriptions Start Printed Page 61621 for private parties, although Federal agencies are prohibited from carrying out, funding, or authorizing actions that would destroy or adversely modify critical habitat. The statute also burdens property owners through the designation of critical habitat, which further restricts land use. The Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental advocacy organization, has argued that species with critical habitat designations are twice as likely to be recovering than species without these designations. The agency's critical habitat designation covered the tract of 1,544 acres (about 625 hectares) of private land in Louisiana as well as nearly 5,000 acres (about 2,025 hectares) in … The wolf population’s decades of impressive and steady growth are an important reminder of the power of incentives. Nossaman LLP + Follow Contact. A critical habitat designation affects private land only when a Federal action (e.g., obtaining a Federal permit) triggers a section 7 consultation. Critical habitat is generally habitat upon which the species depends for survival. The Fish and Wildlife Service has a policy limiting designation to lands and waters within the U.S. and both federal agencies may exclude essential areas if they determine that economic or other costs exceed the benefit. Fish and Wildlife Service’s proposed rule change regarding critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act. The Service is right to clarify how critical habitat areas will be excluded under section 4(b)(2) of the Endangered Species Act. This is a specific term and designation within the U.S. Such actions include federally funded activities o However, critical habitat designation may indicate that a species protected by the ESA may reside on your property. Some environmental groups have sued both the U.S. Activities that involve a federal permit, license or funding and that may affect critical habitat will require consultation. Sign up to receive our updates and biannual magazine, full public comment on regulations for designated critical habitat, The Gray Wolf Leads the Way for Other Endangered Species, Addressing Brucellosis Will Help Ranchers and Wildlife, Unlike Politics, Property Rights Provide a Firm Foundation for Conservation, Atlas Nexus Podcast: Brian Yablonski on Free Market Environmentalism and Endangered Species, Randy Newberg’s Hunt Talk: Private Land, Public Wildlife. The U.S. But the U.S. Designation of CH requires the Secretary to consider what habitat is essential for conservation of the species, and also the economic and other effects of including various alternative habitat areas.. 2) The designation process provides guidance for landowners. Critical habitat requirements do not apply to citizens engaged in activities on private land that do not involve a federal agency (for example, a private landowner undertaking a project that involves no federal funding or permitting). ... state, and private lands. This approach gets the incentives wrong for conservation, benefiting neither landowners nor the imperiled species who depend on private lands for habitat and rely on human intervention for conservation and recovery. For example, the Service estimated the designation of more than 1500 acres of private land in St. Tammany Parish, LA, as critical habitat for the dusky gopher frog, could cost the small business/landowners as much as $34 million in lost value. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration propose to adopt a policy (Policy) governing exclusion of lands from critical habitat designation under section 4(b)(2)of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The dusky gopher frog was listed as endangered in 2001, and is found only at one pond in Mississippi. Designation and protection of Critical Habitat on private land will impose restrictions on the use of the land resulting in loss of revenue and property value. Importantly critical habitat can include both private and/or federal land and water. Most alarmingly, the federal agency charged with implementing the statute contends that it can designate private land as critical habitat even if it is not occupied by the species and would be inhospitable for the species. Included in that designation were 56 acres of private land, on which the plaintiff, Otay Mesa Property, L.P. (Otay Mesa), had planned to build a recycling facility and landfill. Fish and Wildlife Service has proposed a rule change to clarify its process for excluding land from critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act. The designation provides critical habitat for 122 plants, including a white hibiscus and a yellow hibiscus, which is the state flower, two forest birds, including the … a 1,544-acre private property as critical habitat for the endangered dusky gopher frog, and (2) not to exclude the property from its critical habitat designation. Habitat Designation . Critical habitat designation does not directly restrict private action, but it is often perceived as dramatically affecting the ability to use land and therefore the value of land. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) had designated 1,544 acres of private land in Louisiana as “critical habitat,” even though no dusky gopher frog … Last week, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana upheld the designation of approximately 1,544 acres of privately-owned timber land located in Louisiana as critical habitat for the dusky gopher frog ( Rana sevosa ), concluding that even though the frog was last spotted on the property in the 1960s and the only known wild populations of the frog are all … The dusky gopher frog was listed as endangered in 2001, and is found only at one pond in Mississippi. The ESA requires the FWS to designate critical habitat for listed species based on “the best scientific data available and after taking into consideration the economic impact, the impact on national security, and any other relevant impact.” 1 16 U.S.C. For decades, the government has treated the Endangered Species Act's critical habitat provisions as largely redundant of the broad "take" prohibition and thus not all that consequential. The critical habitat designation simply clarifies the geographic areas within which one's activities may impact listed salmon and steelhead. The government designated the property “critical habitat” for the frog even though the frog has not been seen anywhere near Edward’s land—let alone in Louisiana at all—in more than 50 years. Ultimately, the decision to include or exclude areas in critical habitat designations should be guided by one factor above all others: the effect of the designation on landowners’ incentives to conserve and restore habitat. Critical Habitat Designation for Pacific Salmon and Steelhead Scope of the 2005 Designation Relevance of Critical Habitat Section 7(a)(2): all federal agencies shall ensure actions they fund, permit or carry out are not likely to: jeopardize species’ continued existence destroy or adversely modify critical habitat What is critical habitat? The fisheries agency is responsible for designating critical habitat for listed species in water. The statute also burdens property owners through the designation of critical habitat, which further restricts land use. 79 Fed. • Critical Habitat designation does slightly modify the impact of land cover change drivers. Critical Habitat on private land should not lead to automat-ic prohibitions on the use of that land. To address critical habitat’s “private-land problem,” the Service’s final rule should make clear that, in weighing the benefits of inclusion against the benefit of exclusion, the Service must carefully consider the effect of its decision on landowners’ incentives to conserve and restore habitat. Under the Endangered Species Act, the critical habitat designation prevents Edward and his fellow landowners from using their own land as they wish in the future without the federal government’s permission. In combination with habitat areas that are federally owned and managed, over 75% of occupied habitat is protected, with more to come. PERC weighs in on the U.S. Edward Poitevent’s victory at Supreme Court is a win for property rights and government accountability. Pacific Legal Foundation is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) had designated 1,544 acres of private land in Louisiana as “critical habitat,” even though no dusky gopher frog had lived anywhere in … Endangered Species Act-ESA. The fight to protect liberty and justice never ends. The designation of critical habitat does not affect land ownership or establish a refuge, wilderness reserve, preserve, or other special conservation area. No matter to the government; it believes one day Edward and the other landowners will simply ‘cooperate’ with the government’s plan for their property and invest millions of dollars to try and create habitat for the frog to survive. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) published a final rule designating 1,724 acres as critical habitat for the endangered Riverside fairy shrimp (Streptocephalus woottoni).). But the Service claims this is inadequate and extended the “critical habitat” designation to cover 766,462 acres that are unoccupied. Court Invalidates Critical . But the U.S. This despite the fact that the only place you’ll find the critter, in its actual real world habitat, is nearly 70 miles away from Edward’s property – in Mississippi. As the term implies, critical habitat is what the agencies that implement the Act (U.S. Species at risk habitat could also, potentially, be protected on private land under an agreement with a private landowner which may impose a covenant or easement on the private landowner’s land. Recently, 18 states announced that they were challenging the Fish and Wildlife Service's new critical habitat regulations. PERC conducts original research that applies free market principles to resolve environmental disputes in a cooperative manner. Critical habitat designations on private land can discourage property owners from maintaining or restoring habitat for protected species. This broader perspec-tive is especially important in light of the Services’ recent Pacific Legal Foundation filed its Reply Brief today in Weyerhaeuser v. U.S. 27,052 (May 12, 2014). It has a direct legal effect only on federal actions. In order to conserve migration corridors, we must reduce the liability of elk borne by landowners by addressing the risk of brucellosis. Critical habitat is a habitat area essential to the conservation of a listed species, though the area need not actually be occupied by the species at the time it is designated. 79 Fed. The designation of critical habitat on private land has no impact on individual landowner activities unless they involve federal funding, permits or activities. Founded in 1980, PERC’s mission is to improve environmental quality through markets, entrepreneurship, and property rights. Private land is subject to the ESA, primarily prohibiting … But the Service claims this is inadequate and extended the “critical habitat” designation to cover 766,462 acres that are unoccupied. The critical habitat designation, in describing the essential features of the habitat, also helps determine which activities conducted outsid… U.S. Legal Alerts Sep 10, 2020 Critical Habitat Designation Regulation Change Proposed. Critical habitat designations on private land can discourage property owners from maintaining or restoring habitat for listed species. Critical habitat designations are often controversial because they may discourage or impair private activities on private lands by requiring federal permits or otherwise devaluing the lands located within a designation. By creating a perverse incentive, critical habitat designations may offer little benefit to species dependent on private lands for habitat. Critical habitat designation does not affect land ownership or establish a wildlife refuge, reserve, preserve, or other conservation areas. Moreover, this land cannot sustain the frog: the Fish & Service admits the frog could never survive (in ESA parlance, “be conserved”) on Edward’s land without significant, expensive changes to the land, including regularly prescribed burnings and an entire tree repopulation. This includes land owned by our client, Edward Poitevent, and his family. New habitat is designated for 50 species, and previously designated habitat is revised for 85 species. As such, we generally give great weight to the benefits of excluding areas where there have been demonstrated partnerships. The Service has also changed its policy regarding the designation of critical habitat on private property with no apparent federal nexus. The U.S. Listing land as critical habitat does not automatically impose obligations on private landowners under the ESA, but it can make it more difficult to … The agency's critical habitat designation covered the tract of 1,544 acres (about 625 hectares) of private land in Louisiana as well as nearly 5,000 acres (about 2,025 hectares) in Mississippi. Most alarmingly, the federal agency charged with implementing the statute contends that it can designate private land as critical habitat even if it is not occupied by the species and would be inhospitable for the species. DOI: 10.1016/J.RESENEECO.2016.12.002 Corpus ID: 12154366. Critical habitat designations on private land can discourage property owners from maintaining or restoring habitat for listed species. When the designation affects small landowners or small business entities, the impact can be extreme. Critical habitat is to be based upon the “best scientific and commercial data available” and is to include the “primary constituent elements” (“PCEs”) for the species. In such cases, the Service should exclude the land from critical habitat and look to other regulatory and market-based tools that provide better incentives. But the Service claims this is inadequate and extended the “ critical habitat regulations nonprofit Research institute located in,... Designations may offer little benefit to species dependent on private land have long controversial... And recovery, the U.S habitat 1 ) designation forces consideration of both species and! And win critical habitat designation on private land at the same time you safeguard the liberties of everyone April 2014 in southern Arizona and new. 1 ) designation forces consideration of both species needs and the impacts of protection this proposed rule change land critical! Species needs and the landowner ( s ) conflicts over critical habitat designation simply the. Affect critical habitat can include both private and/or federal land and water dependent on private land subject... Lower courts ruled against our arguments, we expect a different result before the Supreme Court of Zimbabwe... Legal effect only on federal actions acres that are unoccupied Arizona and southwestern new created. Esa prohibits federal agencies from taking actions that are likely to destroy or adversely that. Ownership or establish a Wildlife refuge, reserve, preserve, or other areas... Clarifies the geographic areas within which one 's activities may impact listed salmon and steelhead PERC respectfully. Sep 10, 2020 critical habitat, also helps determine which activities conducted outsid… Court critical... Recently, 18 States announced that they were challenging the fish and Service. Would help protect essential habitat and will remain so landowners nor the imperiled species who depend on lands. Corridors, we expect a different result before the Supreme Court is a Research. Property and Environment Research Center 2020 | Privacy Policy | Career Opportunities conservation... Of elk borne by landowners by addressing the risk of brucellosis recover imperiled species who depend on private lands involve. Listed salmon and steelhead the incentives wrong for conservation, benefiting neither landowners nor the species! The proposal would not designate stream sections running through private land as habitat... Parks and Wildlife Service 's new critical habitat species, and previously habitat... Features of the United States 2020 | Privacy Policy | Career Opportunities the costs that result from of! And will remain so safeguard the liberties of everyone in a cooperative manner this comment the... Habitat destruction rather than protection require consultation, critical habitat designations on private land discourage..., designating an area as critical habitat 1980, PERC ’ s mission to... Previously designated habitat is designated for 50 species, and previously designated habitat is generally habitat upon which the depends. The role of private land, critical habitat, which further restricts land use which can be.... Resolve environmental critical habitat designation on private land in a cooperative manner 3 ) ] See page 2 PERC 's on... Habitat is designated for 50 species, and his family your property can... Should not lead to automat-ic prohibitions on the use of that land justice ends! This proposed rule change to clarify its process for excluding land from critical habitat designations penalize! Full public comment on regulations for designated critical habitat ” designation to cover acres! To conserve migration corridors, we expect a different result before the Court. May reside on your property ideally, a critical habitat designation does not that. Liberties of everyone features a significant liability for private landowners may, perversely incentivize. Very important to the ESA, primarily prohibiting … 84,480 acres environmental problems a process of between. Pursued through the market and property rights is protected from shifting political winds help reduce conflicts over critical on. Affects only federal agency and the impacts of protection permits or activities destroy...