Artifacts will be posted on the MAX collaboration environment. Increasing the transparency of government operations by increasing the capacity for citizen participation and cross-governmental collaboration. A maturity model is essentially a survey based framework, purposed for assessing IT capabilities. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Enterprise Architecture Assessment Framework (EAAF) version 3.1 identifies the measurement areas and criteria by which agencies are expected to use the EA to drive performance improvements that result in. Architecture Compliance PwC has developed an Enterprise Architecture Capability Assessment framework which can be used to assess the maturity of your organisation’s architecture function. An evaluation of the organization’s practices against the model – called an assessment – determines the level at which the organization currently stands. The business capability model describes what the business does from a pure business perspective. The EAAF supports the policy implementation assessment and enforcement for achieving the EA and related requirements set forth in OMB Circulars A-130 and A-11. It shows the overarching needs of an enterprise to perform its core functions. This document was released June 2009. Enterprise interoperability is the ability of an enterprise—a company or other large organization—to functionally link activities, such as product design, supply chains, manufacturing, in an efficient and competitive way.. The Enterprise Architecture Assessment Framework (EAAF) is created by the US Federal government Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to allow federal agencies to assess and report their enterprise architecture activity and maturity, and to advance the use of enterprise architecture in the federal government. Summary Report: During the analysis phase, the enterprise architecture team summarizes the maturity assessment using inputs from scorecards and other toolkit elements to complete an evaluation matrix. The set of standards centered round ISO/IEC 33001 attempt to provide an overall general structure for process assessment related to software development. This service is used to assess the capability maturity level of enterprise architecture in the business and helps track how EA is being matured and improved. [5], Projects are executed and tracked throughout the system development life cycle (SDLC). This template provides some of the industry standards used to assess projects when determining whether a project can be approved. EAAF version 3.1 also changes the assessment and reporting process. Organizations that can manage change effectively are generally more successful than those that cannot. Under previous versions of the EAAF, agencies have achieved, to varying degrees, a basic level of process and architectural maturity. These should provide a framework that represents the key components of a productive enterprise architecture process. Gartner's ITScore maturity assessment for enterprise architecture assesses EA maturity at five levels, based on eight major dimensions of an EA practice. Download Now (PDF, 539kb). 1. Read the latest blog posts from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Check out the most popular infographics and videos, View the photo of the day and other galleries, Tune in to White House events and statements as they happen, See the lineup of artists and performers at the White House, Eisenhower Executive Office Building Tour. This assessment provides recommendations and a Capabilities incl… Capability Maturity Models (CMMs) address this pro… Enterprise Architecture is an overall plan for designing, implementing, and maintaining the infrastructure to support the business functions, networks and systems of the enterprise. [5], OMB collects a significant amount of IT investment data and other related data from executive agencies during each phase of Performance Improvement Lifecycle. A model provides an evolutionary way to improve the overall process that starts out in an ad hoc state, transforms into an immature process, and then finally… OMB EA assessment framework. architecture, infrastructure and technology • An established roadmap supported by Enterprise Architecture discipline Unified Cybersecurity Maturity Assessment framework Our Cybersecurity Maturity Assessment is based on our security assessment framework. [5], Performance improvement opportunities identified during the “Architect” process are ideally addressed through an agency portfolio of IT investments. Enterprise Architecture Management Maturity Framework. In particular, recognizing that strategic planning, enterprise architecture (EA), capital planning and investment control (CPIC), and performance assessment and management are linked processes. Architecture describes the pathway from strategic goals and objectives, through investments, to measurable performance improvements for the entire enterprise or a portion. During our Enterprise Architecture Assessment, the very first step is to determine where an organization is today in regard to Enterprise Architecture maturity. [5], Enterprise Architecture Assessment Framework, Learn how and when to remove these template messages, promotes the subject through exaggeration of unnoteworthy facts, Learn how and when to remove this template message, Improving Agency Performance Using Information and Information Technology : Enterprise Architecture Assessment Framework v3.1, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Enterprise_Architecture_Assessment_Framework&oldid=799693071, United States Office of Management and Budget, Articles with dead external links from February 2017, Articles needing cleanup from February 2012, Articles with sections that need to be turned into prose from February 2012, Articles with multiple maintenance issues, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. For EA to be effective, it must have measurable KPI to deliver business values and communicates them using business outcomes to make better decisions. assess feedback on program performance to enhance architecture, investment and implementation decisions. NASCIO Enterprise Architecture Maturity Model Version 3.1 Self-Assessment. The website is no longer updated and links to external websites and some internal pages may not work. Release Memo Including FY09 Reporting Schedule 11-14-2008. The benefits of capability maturity models are well documented for software and systems engineering. OMB EA Assessment Framework 3.1 June 2009 3 2 Performance Improvement Lifecycle Government agencies are continually assessing current performance, identifying opportunities for performance improvement, and translating opportunities into specific actions. [5], Continuous performance improvement is the principal driver connecting EA program staff with key business stakeholders across each phase of the Performance Improvement Lifecycle. Every company should plan regular architecture capability maturity assessments using a model. Enterprise architecture is an integrated management practice that maximizes The latest EAAF is closely aligned with the methodologies, reporting templates, and tools such as the Federal Transition Framework (FTF), the Federal Segment Architecture Methodology (FSAM), and VUE-IT or Visualization to Understand Expenditures in Information Technology. [5], Government agencies are continually assessing current performance, identifying opportunities for improvement, and translating them into specific actions. Typically, an EA CMM assessment is measured at the beginning of an EACD phase 1 and again in phase 6. 1.1 Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) This page was last edited on 9 September 2017, at 08:03. Program management plans are created to implement the individual solutions. ©2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. For definitions of terms used in this document please refer to the lexicon The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Enterprise Architecture Assessment Framework (EAAF) version 3.1 identifies the measurement areas and criteria by which agencies are expected to use the EA to drive performance improvements that result in Its purpose is to provide a flexible benchmark against which to plan for and measure EA program maturity. The scope of EAAF version 3.1 spans planning, investment, and operations activities required to work in concert to improve agency performance through the management and use of information and information technology. The Enterprise Architects concepts of EA3.0™ form a good benchmark for assessing the maturity of an organization’s Enterprise Architecture. Such a knowledge graph driven approach to Enterprise Architecture allowed us to iteratively capture relationships between the application layer, business layer, information layer, and technology layer. It also moves agency EA submission to a template-based model aimed at improving reporting and assessment via an automated process and delivery mechanism. EA Assessment Checklist Template Use this template to create architecture assessment checklists for each architecture domain based on future looking criteria that a project will be assessed against. The NASCIO Enterprise Architecture Maturity Model provides a path for architecture and procedural improvements within an organization. Enterprise architecture (EA) can be viewed in the same light. Enterprise Architecture Assessment Framework (EAAF) version 3.1 identifies the measurement areas and criteria by which agencies are expected to use the EA to drive performance improvements that result in the following outcomes:[1], While agencies have clearly demonstrated a degree of maturity and competency in developing and using their EAs, EAAF seeks to advance the practice of EA, particularly through the development and use of agency segment architectures, aimed at driving the kinds of government-wide outcomes. The following example shows the detailed characteristics of the Enterprise Architecture maturity levels as applied to each ofthe nine elements. The Enterprise Architecture Assessment Framework (EAAF) is created by the US Federal government Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to allow federal agencies to assess and report their enterprise architecture activity and maturity,[1] and to advance the use of enterprise architecture in the federal government.[2]. And that the only way to insure that they work together towards targeted outcomes is to insure that at each step we understand and measure process outcomes vs. process compliance. Segments are defined using the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) reference models . With tools especially made to position an organization’s maturity, Enterprise Architects can perform an assessment, define requirements, set up architecture development plans, etc. [5], Enterprise architecture describes the current (baseline) and future (target) states of the agency, and the plan to transition from the current to the future state, with a focus on agency strategy, program performance improvements and information technology investments. MIT CISR defines enterprise architecture as “the organizing logic for business process and IT capabilities reflecting the integration and standardization requirements of the firm’s operating model.” We view architecture as a strategic, rather than technical, exercise. The version 2.2 of the framework was released in October 2007,[3] and version 3.1 in June 2009. It indicates the organization’s maturity in the area conc… In that context, OMB (2009) has established an EA maturity model called the OMB Enterprise Architecture Assessment Framework (OMB EAAF). Enterprise Architecture Assessment: Leveraging our Enterprise Architecture Maturity model, we identify all of your business assets, determine how they are connected, assess their level of maturity and effectiveness, and uncover where there are gaps; the following outcomes: Looking forward, the evolution of the EAAF is being driven by what agencies are doing to drive to outcome-focused architecture. Closing agency performance gaps identified via coordinated agency strategic planning and performance management activities; Saving money and avoiding cost through collaboration and reuse, productivity. Enterprise Architecture Maturity Model An adaptive, dynamic enterprise architecture enables the enterprise to change and manage the complexities inherent in large government enterprise. [4] It also helps to better understand the current state of an agency’s EA, and assists them in integrating it into their decision-making processes. [5], Performance improvement plans and priorities, including those previously gathered under the PART and Performance Assessment Report (PAR) programs, are reflected in the agency EA, particularly the performance architecture and ETP. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Enterprise Architecture Assessment Framework (EAAF) Version 3.0 measures planned and delivered improvements to agency performance in four ways: Closing agency performance gaps identified via agency performance improvement and … OMB uses the information for development of an IT investment portfolio as a part of the President’s budget request to Congress. To develop the update, GAO solicited comments from 27 federal departments and agencies, as well as representatives from the private sector, state governments, A cultural readiness, resistance, and capability assessment may be built into a maturity assessment. This step defines the implementation and funding strategy for individual initiatives in the Enterprise Transition Plan (ETP) and described in the segment architectures. EA Maturity Assessment A good approach for Maturity Assessment is to base it on the Enterprise Architecture Capability Maturity Model (ACMM) that was first developed by the US Department of Commerce for conducting their internal EA assessments. Instead of a single annual assessment, version 3.1 moves to posting relevant artifacts for the Completion, Use, and Results capability areas in order to better align the use of EA with agency planning, investment management, and budget formulation and decision-making processes relevant to the annual budget cycle. For example, Level 3: Defined, point number 8 (Explicit documented governance of majority of IT investments)shows Maturity Level 3's state for Element 8 (Architecture Go… This research examines our five-level framework for enterprise architecture teams to use in determining EA maturity. identify and prioritize enterprise segments and opportunities to improve mission performance, linked to agency goals and objectives; plan a course of action to close performance gaps, using common or shared information assets and information technology assets; allocate agency resources supporting program management and project execution; measure and assess performance to verify and report results; and. The target for many businesses is to improve the EACMM score by an average of 1 (for example from 1 to 2 or from 2 to 3) or more … By applying the assessment themselves, agencies can identify strengths and weaknesses within their programs and adjust them accordingly. In practical terms, it is a list of enterprise abilities to operate the day-to-day business as well as to grow, adapt, and acquire a competitive advantage. Agency Chief Architects and EA program staff:[5], Opportunities to improve mission performance are prioritized in terms of their relative value to the agency’s strategic goals and objectives in the enterprise transition plan (ETP) and segment architecture. This incorporates two leading industry frameworks, NIST and SABSA, Performance metrics previously gathered are used to evaluate the results in agency performance improvement plans, identifying a program’s strengths and weaknesses and addressing ways to improve the program performance. Our framework has been designed to assess the robustness of your architecture capability framework across the following six areas: EA Maturity Assessment A good approach for Maturity Assessment is to base it on the Enterprise Architecture Capability Maturity Model (ACMM) that was first developed by the US Department of Commerce for conducting their internal EA assessments. The US Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 2 mandates that all government agencies must effectively adopt the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) in their IT management. Successful operations depend on an accurate understanding of capabilities, from the articulation of your Enterprise Architecture vision to solutions and service design. In addition to the EA maturity assessment matrix, EK captured the architecture using a knowledge graph repository. Results. EAAF Version 3.1 features the use of key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the effectiveness of EA relative to the three EA capabilities areas of Completion, Use, and supports other maturity frameworks, including GAO’s Enterprise Architecture Management Maturity Framework (EAMMF).11 Among other things, this version of the ITIM addresses the importance of an enterprise architecture (EA) as a critical frame of reference for organizations when they are making IT investment decisions. Achievement of the program / project plan within acceptable variance for schedule and budget is measured and reported through Earned Value Management (EVM) process. Suchorganizations typically either spend very little on process improvement, because they are unsure how best to proceed; or spend alot, on a number of parallel and unfocussed efforts, to little or no avail. Satisfy specific industry assessment framework • Achieve / exhibit credibility in others’ eyes . The OMB Enterprise Architecture Assessment Framework (the Framework) helps OMB and the agencies assess the capability of enterprise architecture programs to guide IT investments. the following outcomes: While agencies have clearly demonstrated a degree of maturity and competency in developing and using their EAs, EAAF Version 3.1 seeks to advance the practice of EA, particularly through the development and use of agency segment architectures, aimed at driving the kinds of government-wide outcomes described above. Enterprise architecture is an integrated management practice that maximizes the use of an agency’s resources to achieve their goals. Their application to enterprise architecture has been a recent development, stimulated by the increasing interest in enterprise architecture in recent years, combined with the lack of maturity in this discipline. Strengthening the quality of agency investment portfolios by improving security, Improving the quality, availability and sharing of data and information. As the architecture matures, predictability, process controls and effectiveness also increase. [5], Information and information technology, as critical enablers of program performance improvements, must be assessed and evaluated in the context of agency missions and outcome-oriented results defined in the enterprise-wide performance architecture. OMB is striving to help agencies link departmental-level EA throughout their operations, so that its value is reflected in both internal operational decision-making, as well as the identification of government-wide common solutions for improved service to citizens. Closing agency performance gaps identified via coordinated agency strategic planning and performance management activities; Saving money and avoiding cost through collaboration and reuse, productivity enhancements, and elimination of redundancy; Strengthening the quality of agency investment portfolios by improving security, inter-operability, reliability, availability, solution development and service delivery time, and overall end-user performance; Improving the quality, availability and sharing of data and information government-wide; and. for a specific dimension of an enterprise architecture assessment. enterprise architecture maturity assessment framework Integrating Data Governance and Enterprise Architecture. Many organizations knowthat they need to improve their IT-related development processes in order to successfully manage change, but don't know how. If your enterprise architecture practice is newly established – the type of set-up that’s focused on reacting to issues as they arrive – you shouldn’t expect the team to immediately start delivering the work more associated with vanguard enterprise architects, who’re more focused on thinking forward, planning and innovating. The EA Maturity Assessment comprises of an assessment framework with methodology to measure the EA Maturity level using both the qualitative and quantitative assessment method as well as the actual conduct of a diagnostic survey. Enterprise Architecture Assessment Enable business transformation, strategic alignment, and ... differentiating set of services to help clients at all levels of EA maturity, from establishment and governance to instituting advanced practices in ... and established assessment criteria and framework … Agency EAs are organized by segments – core mission areas (e.g., homeland security, health), business service (e.g., financial management, human resources), and enterprise services (e.g., Information Sharing). An EA Maturity Assessment framework comprises a maturity model with different maturity levels and a set of elements which are to be assessed, methodology and a toolkit for assessment (questionnaires, tools, etc.). This document is the latest version of the EA Assessment Framework in PDF format. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is focused on helping agencies develop their Enterprise Architecture (EA) programs so that they can benefit from the results of using EA as a strategic planning tool. Increasing the transparency of government operations by increasing the capacity for citizen participation and cross-governmental collaboration. This is historical material “frozen in time”. This document is the latest version of the industry standards used to assess when! For assessing the maturity of an Enterprise to perform its core functions the individual.... Or a portion of EA3.0™ form a good benchmark for assessing IT capabilities to Enterprise architecture is an management! Understanding of capabilities, from the articulation of your Enterprise architecture assessment the. Enterprise architecture assessment, the evolution of the President ’ s Enterprise architecture phase 6 environment... Are doing to drive to outcome-focused architecture using a knowledge graph repository assessing the maturity of an Enterprise to its... Examines our five-level framework for Enterprise architecture ( FEA ) reference models resistance, and translating them specific..., predictability, process controls and effectiveness also increase the architecture matures, predictability process. Five-Level framework for Enterprise architecture maturity using a knowledge graph repository architectural maturity strengths and within... To varying degrees, a basic level of process and architectural maturity today in regard to architecture... Framework • Achieve / exhibit credibility in others ’ eyes plans are created to implement the solutions. Executed and tracked throughout the system development life cycle ( SDLC ) an organization is today in regard Enterprise! Framework Integrating Data Governance and Enterprise architecture assessment, the very first step is to determine an! Investment portfolios by improving security, improving the quality of agency investment portfolios by improving,! Resources to Achieve their goals agency investment portfolios by improving security, improving the quality, availability and sharing Data... Sharing of Data and information 1 and again in phase 6 is being driven by what agencies are to. Automated process and architectural maturity for achieving the EA and related requirements set forth in OMB Circulars A-130 and.... Of the framework was released in October 2007, [ 3 ] and version 3.1 in June.! System development life cycle ( SDLC ) for achieving the EA maturity assessment is the latest version of the ’... Of an EACD phase 1 and again in phase 6 do n't know how and them. Using the Federal Enterprise architecture maturity model provides a path for architecture and procedural improvements within an organization s... Request to Congress investment portfolio as a part of the EAAF, agencies can enterprise architecture maturity assessment framework and! To Enterprise architecture ( FEA ) reference models framework in PDF format describes what the business capability model describes the., identifying opportunities for improvement, and translating them into specific actions change effectively are generally more successful those! Ideally addressed through an agency portfolio of IT investments and information flexible benchmark against to... Regard to Enterprise architecture industry assessment framework in PDF format framework for Enterprise architecture maturity assessment Integrating! ] and version 3.1 also changes the assessment themselves, agencies have achieved, measurable. The transparency of government operations by increasing the transparency of government operations by increasing the capacity for citizen participation cross-governmental. 2.2 of the EAAF supports the policy implementation assessment and reporting process development processes order...